# Corrections and disagreements

> Editorial enquiries at Keystone Peptide — Contact information for Keystone Peptide, the scope of editorial corrections and the details needed to identify an error in a research claim.

**Editorial contact**

A precise objection is useful, especially when it changes the balance of the survival argument.

## Contact availability

Keystone Peptide currently has no public inbox or message form. This page cannot receive a submission.

The site’s subject is published research, so the useful scope of a correction is the text itself: an outcome assigned to the wrong preparation, a population described too broadly, or a conclusion that asks more of an experiment than it can answer. An objection about my emphasis on the average animal would be particularly useful.

## Details for an editorial correction

A correction needs the page address, the exact sentence at issue and the relevant passage in the published paper. The [reading list](/references) identifies the studies discussed here. A disagreement about interpretation also benefits from naming the result that would change the argument.

Please leave personal medical information out of any editorial correspondence. These pages cannot assess symptoms, interpret an individual test result or guide treatment. The [about page](/about) explains the purpose of Keystone Peptide.

---

Keystone Peptide is my argument with the published Epitalon experiments, especially the mouse near the middle of the group, and these essays provide no medical advice.